Comments on: Thoughts on ThyncRecord http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/09/thoughts-on-thyncrecord/ The Science of Thynctank. Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:59:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: thynctank http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/09/thoughts-on-thyncrecord/comment-page-1/#comment-1875 thynctank Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:39:32 +0000 http://www.thynctank.com/?p=94#comment-1875 <p>The code will be made available on some public versioning system or other as soon as it's in a mostly-usable state. It's definitely not ready for prime time yet.</p> <p>Before too long it will be usable but slow, and I'll release it then. After that will be a long optimization process converting the current recursive SQL querying into single bigass queries for building multiple associated Record objects at once.</p> <p>There's also the question of some architectural changes as I've been learning more about MooTools. Not a lot will change usage-wise, I aim to keep it as simple and as ActiveRecord-like as possible.</p> The code will be made available on some public versioning system or other as soon as it’s in a mostly-usable state. It’s definitely not ready for prime time yet.

Before too long it will be usable but slow, and I’ll release it then. After that will be a long optimization process converting the current recursive SQL querying into single bigass queries for building multiple associated Record objects at once.

There’s also the question of some architectural changes as I’ve been learning more about MooTools. Not a lot will change usage-wise, I aim to keep it as simple and as ActiveRecord-like as possible.

]]> By: David Rivers http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/09/thoughts-on-thyncrecord/comment-page-1/#comment-1874 David Rivers Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:49:30 +0000 http://www.thynctank.com/?p=94#comment-1874 <p>I really like how similar the syntax appears to Rails, thus minimizing the learning curve for at least some people. I'm interested in seeing the underlying code.</p> I really like how similar the syntax appears to Rails, thus minimizing the learning curve for at least some people. I’m interested in seeing the underlying code.

]]>