<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gracefully Degrading Widgets, Part 1: Tabs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/02/gracefully-degrading-widgets-part-1-tabs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/02/gracefully-degrading-widgets-part-1-tabs/</link>
	<description>The Science of Thynctank.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:59:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thyncology : Gracefully Degrading Widgets, Part 2: Navbars &#38; jQuery Plugins</title>
		<link>http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/02/gracefully-degrading-widgets-part-1-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator>thyncology : Gracefully Degrading Widgets, Part 2: Navbars &#38; jQuery Plugins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/02/gracefully-degrading-widgets-part-1-tabs/#comment-1934</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Previously, I discussed some of the fundamental ideas behind Gracefully Degrading Widgets, but let&#8217;s quickly delineate them again here: [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Previously, I discussed some of the fundamental ideas behind Gracefully Degrading Widgets, but let&#8217;s quickly delineate them again here: [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rivers</title>
		<link>http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/02/gracefully-degrading-widgets-part-1-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rivers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/02/gracefully-degrading-widgets-part-1-tabs/#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, do look into that cowbell...
...and thanks for the clarifications.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, do look into that cowbell&#8230;
&#8230;and thanks for the clarifications.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thynctank</title>
		<link>http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/02/gracefully-degrading-widgets-part-1-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>thynctank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/02/gracefully-degrading-widgets-part-1-tabs/#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To clarify further on your last comment: &quot;$(this)&quot; is required to obtain a jQuery object vs a simple DOM node, which the variable &quot;this&quot; is before wrapping it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify further on your last comment: &#8220;$(this)&#8221; is required to obtain a jQuery object vs a simple DOM node, which the variable &#8220;this&#8221; is before wrapping it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thynctank</title>
		<link>http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/02/gracefully-degrading-widgets-part-1-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>thynctank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/02/gracefully-degrading-widgets-part-1-tabs/#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the read/comments, David. Definitely good suggestions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I plan on adding some sort of sidebar (perhaps one with minimizable sections that bobs along with the reader) with relevant code fragments/explanations beside the content, as well as plopping in a TOC sort of box dealy with named anchors for long posts like this one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The syntax highlighter plugin actually doesn&#039;t use a stylesheet, it&#039;s all inline styles so it works even within feed readers. (check it out on FeedBurner by following the RSS link at bottom) I will definitely be looking at this soon.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Linking to relevant jQuery docs is a good idea, which I&#039;ll follow inasmuch as the first time a function shows up I&#039;ll link to it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll look into the cowbell suggestion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I had linked to the jQ function parents() line 3 would&#039;ve made more sense. (see here: http://docs.jquery.com/Traversing/parents#expr) &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Passing in a CSS selector string filters the results which would otherwise provide the entire set of ancestors for a given node.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The function &quot;parent()&quot; (singular) returns only the direct parent. The function &quot;parents()&quot; (plural) returns this ancestor set. It&#039;s the fastest way to obtain such references.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since &quot;.tabset&quot; may or may not be the direct parent, depending on varying markup mentioned earlier in the article, calling parents() was the safer bet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the read/comments, David. Definitely good suggestions.</p>

<p>I plan on adding some sort of sidebar (perhaps one with minimizable sections that bobs along with the reader) with relevant code fragments/explanations beside the content, as well as plopping in a TOC sort of box dealy with named anchors for long posts like this one.</p>

<p>The syntax highlighter plugin actually doesn&#8217;t use a stylesheet, it&#8217;s all inline styles so it works even within feed readers. (check it out on FeedBurner by following the RSS link at bottom) I will definitely be looking at this soon.</p>

<p>Linking to relevant jQuery docs is a good idea, which I&#8217;ll follow inasmuch as the first time a function shows up I&#8217;ll link to it.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ll look into the cowbell suggestion.</p>

<p>If I had linked to the jQ function parents() line 3 would&#8217;ve made more sense. (see here: <a href="http://docs.jquery.com/Traversing/parents#expr" rel="nofollow">http://docs.jquery.com/Traversing/parents#expr</a>) </p>

<p>Passing in a CSS selector string filters the results which would otherwise provide the entire set of ancestors for a given node.</p>

<p>The function &#8220;parent()&#8221; (singular) returns only the direct parent. The function &#8220;parents()&#8221; (plural) returns this ancestor set. It&#8217;s the fastest way to obtain such references.</p>

<p>Since &#8220;.tabset&#8221; may or may not be the direct parent, depending on varying markup mentioned earlier in the article, calling parents() was the safer bet.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/02/gracefully-degrading-widgets-part-1-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thynctank.com/javascript/2008/02/gracefully-degrading-widgets-part-1-tabs/#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You guys and your Code!~!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys and your Code!~!!!!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.383 seconds -->

